Skip to main content

Corporate Governance Enhancements

The Company is committed to uphold good corporate governance practices and considers effective corporate governance an essential element to the Group’s success. As such, the Company keeps enhancing its corporate governance. The Group believes that the enhanced corporate governance is a critical contributing factor for its continued positive operational results. Summarised below is a comparison chart that shows the major enhancements made to the Company’s corporate governance since the suspension of trading in the shares of the Company on 21 April 2004 (the “Suspension”).

  Before 2004 In 2010
Segregation of duties
  • There was room for improvement in terms of seperating the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”).
  • The roles of Chairman and CEO are separate and there is a clear division of power and authority in the Board, so that power is not concentrated in any one individual.
Frequency of meetings
  • There was room for improvement in this area by making the arrangement for board meetings to be held regularly.
  • Other than the board meetings for daily operations, the Board meets at least on a quarterly basis.
  • Agenda will be sent to the Directors before a regular board meeting.
  • At least 14 days’ notice is given prior to such meeting.
  • Critical issues are discussed by the Board, and no individual Director or person can influence the decision of the Board.
Board approval
  • These was room for improvement by setting up a set of more comprehensive guidelines for matters that required the Board’s approval.
  • Any transaction (including connected transactions) over HK$1 million must be approved by the Board.
  • If a substantial shareholder/Director (or any of his/her associates) has a conflict of interest in a matter, he or she must abstain from voting.
Emphasis on compliance
  • There was room for improvement by repeatedly reviewing new rules or ordinances
  • There was room for improvement in the ways the Company sought the legal opinions, for example, to seek a second opinion from a different law firm.
  • A seminar relating to a new ordinance was arranged for the employees, and a speaker who has extensive experience in that subject was invited to introduce the contents of the ordinance during the seminar.
  • The Company review new rules or ordinances more than once.
  • Emphasis is placed on the strict compliance of listing rules and ordinances. In case of doubt, the Company will seek a second professional opinion from a different law firm.
  • The Group has retained the following legal advisers: As to Hong Kong law
    • P.C. Woo & Co.
    • D.S. Cheung & Co.
    • Michael Li & Co.
    • Chiu & Partners
    • Andrew Law & Franki Ho
    • Huen & Partners

    As to Bermuda law

    • Appleby

    As to the PRC law

    • Hills & Co.
Standardisation of Work Flow
  • There was room for improving the Company’s corporate governance by developing a corporate governance handbook.
  • There was room for improvement by setting up the more detailed business operation manuals.
  • The Board strictly follows the corporate governance practices, and has properly compiled the Corporate Governance Handbook.
  • To lower the business risk, the Group has followed the standardised work flow prudently.
  • The more detailed operation manuals have been set up.
Independent element in the Board
  • As there were only two Independent Non-Executive Directors (“INEDs”) on the Board, there was room to improve the independent element on the Board by increasing the number of INEDs.
  • The Company has appointed four INEDs, one more than that required by the Listing Rules.
  • To uphold the independency of the Board, the Company has set up an Independent Committee to provide the Board independent advice on the matters relating to legal proceedings against certain current and former directors and the prolonged suspension.
Transparency
  • There was not yet a representative of minority shareholders in a committee of the Company.
  • To increase transparency of the Independent Committee, a representative of minority shareholders has been accepted as a member of the Committee.
Efficiency
  • There was only one committee under the Board.
  • To maintain the efficiency of the Board, the Company has set up four committees, namely the Audit Committee, Remuneration Committee, Nomination Committee and Independent Committee.
Professionalism
  • There was room for improvement in the Group’s management and operation styles.
  • For its brokerage business, there are four senior responsible officers who are registered under the SFO.
  • There are five certified public accountants, two of whom are Board members.
  • There are various experienced legal advisers who provide professional legal opinions to the Board when necessary.
Internal controls
  • There was room for improvement in the Company’s internal controls system.
  • An internal controls review is performed annually and the result is satisfactory.
Shareholders’ interests
  • The scope of shareholders’ interests can be further expanded.
  • A Special General Meeting was convened at the request of minority shareholders in 2009 in which shareholders freely expressed their views.
  • The votes of shareholders at general meetings are taken by poll.
  • Starting from the time of Suspension in 2004:
    • A number of dividends and bonus share issue proposals have been recommended and implemented. For more details, please refer to the section titled “Dividends” above; and
    • the Company has also arranged various gift redemption proposals for its shareholders.
Shareholders’ services
  • The shareholders’ services can be further strengthened.
  • A wholly-owned subsidiary, Shareholders Service Centre Limited, has been set up to enhance the Company’s shareholders services.
  • Shareholders can contact the Company via the following ways:

During the period under reviews, the Company has strictly complied with all of the code provisions in the Code on Corporate Governance Practices contained in Appendix 14 of the Listing Rules except that the Non-Executive Chairman did not attend the Annual General Meeting for the year 2010 due to his personal engagement.

Model Code for Securities Transactions by Directors

The Board has adopted the Model Code for Securities Transactions by Directors of Listed Issuers as set out in Appendix 10 to the Listing Rules (the “Model Code”) as its own code for securities transactions by Directors. All members of the Board has confirmed, following specific enquiry by the Company, that they have complied with the required standard as set out in the Model Code during the period under review.